2012-04-29 10:32:43 UTC
So, what I decided to do is look at a variety of running events and compare, Black African (excluding African Americans & Afro-Caribbeans), Caucasian, and East Asian records to see if black Africans still come out on top. It is a bit of a crude analysis; you have factors such as training facilities working against Africans, but at the same time, you have the fact that in more developed European/Asian economies, with more highly paid jobs available, less people desire to go into athletics.
Anyway, look (some records are missing because they are particularly slow, and are therefore too hard to find):
100m:
Male
1st Black: Fasuba – 9.85. 2nd Caucasian: Lemaitre 9.92 (he is only 21). 3rd Asian: too slow, so no data.
Female
1st Asian: Xuemei - 10.79. 2nd Black: Alozi – 10.90. 3rd Caucasian: Taylor 11.12
1500m:
Male
1st Caucasian: El Guerrouj – 3:26.00. 2nd Black: Lagat – 3:26.34 (close!). 3rd Asian: Too slow, so no data.
Female
1st Caucasian: Ivan – 3:53.96. 2nd Qu: 3:50.40. 3rd Black: Too slow, so no data.
Marathon
Male
1st Black: Makau – 2:03:38, 2nd Asian: Takoaka - 2:06:16, Caucasian: Pinto - 2:06:36
Female
1st Caucasian: Radcliffe – 2:15:25. 2nd Black: 2:18.37. 3rd Asian: 2:19:12
I chose these events because they are the most iconic sprint/middle distance/long distance.
To me, it looks like (for men anyway) that Black Africans do marginally come out on top.... but only marginally