Question:
Crips or Bloods , who is more dangerous ?
anonymous
2010-06-14 17:53:55 UTC
They dont fight amongst each other as bad as they use to and I know they are both wild but in your opinion , who would you say is more violent out of those two . Not any other gang , just out of those two .
Sixteen answers:
STRANGER INYAHOO & FORM
2010-06-15 07:12:53 UTC
Well im from Oakpark so bloods are more wide spread out here. I think Crips get the name, but if there so hard than why Bloods still running things in Sac.



Edit: Did Quick ask about La and mexican gangs I like Picklessss! I mean MS-13. I could name any random Biker Gang who has whoop there as



Edit: Why they violate your first Q on this
cameron
2015-07-10 04:00:44 UTC
Crips have more people they outnumber bloods by 3-1. If you shoot a crip 30 crips will roll up on you. However bloods are more unified violent and aggressive in my opinion they can be brutal I have had to fight some.
?
2016-01-03 13:51:09 UTC
Not all sets are created equal, but as a general rule, Bloods are more aggressive because they're outnumbered by Crips, so they compensate by being more extreme. They're also more likely to attack outsiders. Crips might rob some stranger (non gang) who accidentally winds up in their neighborhood, bloods will shoot you on site.
anonymous
2015-09-24 22:36:06 UTC
Hispanic gang members out number the bloods n crips 100-1 in most states.

Surenos MS 18st are all huge.
anonymous
2017-01-15 21:46:00 UTC
I'm from Sacramento Cali but grew up in L.A. and lived in other cities like Vegas,San Jose,Pasadena .. Crips are more violent. I know from experience Bloods will let anyone join but Crips got to feel you out and be around you to see what up. Bloods are honestly weak when I lived in Pasadena that's Damu land I had a run in with Bloods daily because of my colors but none of them ever attacked all they would say was things like "Bloood" when they see me in my blue that's it they wasn't aggressive or violent. The Villa Park Surenos own them ****** out there.
Edgard
2015-03-10 21:07:17 UTC
In LA, crips are known to be more powerful, but in NYC, bloods are known to be more powerful. Every area is different. If a neighborhood supports the crips than they will likely be stronger. If a neighborhood supports the bloods than they will likely be stronger. It just depends on where you live.
anonymous
2016-03-02 05:05:08 UTC
Depends on who you are. If you're a rich white person then crips and bloods are dangerous. If you're a minority walking around Mississippi then KKK is dangerous.
lamar
2015-06-29 09:02:02 UTC
Bloods
Avinu
2010-06-14 17:59:49 UTC
Crips
North Side U.N.B.
2010-06-14 18:19:38 UTC
In short, the Crips are most likely more powerful, but it'd be hard to determine who is in fact the most dangerous. I'll go into detail below, and I don't mean to insult your intelligence when I explain simple gang knowledge, I'm just trying to make sure I give you a thorough answer.







The first Bloodz set was originally a Crips set. (A set is a division of a gang. For example, say there were two groups of Crips in a city, one on the East side and one on the West side. Members of each group would identify themselves as either West Side Crips or East Side Crips, but in most cases they would not fight each other because they are still both Crips.) The Piru Street Boys were a set that were considered to be Crips, but they began to feud with other Crip sets, and eventually broke off to form the Bloodz. Although many Crip sets are alligned with each other, they sometimes feud amongst themselves, but that is not to say that the Crip sets feuding with other Crip sets wouldn't feud with Bloodz as well.



The Crips have been around longer than the Bloodz, and as a result they have greater numbers than the Bloodz, and the Crips are alligned with the FOLK nation, therefore they are alligned with the Gangster Disciples which is easily the most powerful gang in the Midwest.



Bloodz have a reputation for being dangerous because of the violent types of initiation they use. Although it varies from set to set, Blood initiation often involves acts of violence directed at others. A common initiation for the Bloodz requires the new potential member to go out at night accompanied by another Blood, and slash a pedestrians face with razor blades. Crips usually get "jumped in," meaning the potential member is beaten for a certain amount of time by a certain number of members of the set they are joining. I'm not sure what the rules for Crips are, but when you get jumped into the Gangster Disciples, (which are the biggest gang in my city) six guys beat you for six minutes, you are not allowed to fight back but you are allowed to block their punches. The number six is significant because of the six-point star, which is a symbol for the FOLK nation, which the Crips are also under. (The Bloodz are under the PEOPLE nation, and are alligned with Vice Lords. The PEOPLE nation uses a five point star) Crips also can be "blessed in," which is simply one member giving someone permission to join without any beatings. Sometimes a ceremony is performed for someone being blessed in. I have never heard of the Bloodz blessing somebody in, but in the occasion Bloodz jump someone in they don't have set rules for the beating that takes place. Usually the potential member will be beaten until they are nearly dead. I have also heard of Blood sets that require the person being recruited to be burned on the wrist with a lit cigarette



Bloodz are also known to be violent because of the fact that most sets do not allow someone to leave after joining. Many gangs have a policy of "blood in, blood out," which means that you are in for life, or you will be killed or beaten badly. It all depends on the set though. I know that in most Gangster Disciple sets, you can "drop your flag," which means you no longer rep GD but you do not have to be jumped out. I would imagine that Crips have a similar policy.









So, overall it would be hard to tell because of the different policies that each set has. For example, the GD sets in my town don't have nearly as strict rules as the original GD sets in Chicago. But based on the many facts about each of these gangs, Crips are most likely more dangerous than the Bloodz. And personally, I would agree because in my city and most other cities with gangs that I know of, members of the FOLK nation outnumber members of the PEOPLE nation.
Krystal
2010-06-14 18:01:52 UTC
im going to say, "lol"???



but to answer..

technically there isn't a winner because you can never know the capability of a persons ability. what if that guy luckily killed the head mafia..it would be very hard to tell and thus there should be no "better gang"
Vattessea
2017-03-24 05:33:58 UTC
There both dangerous to me but I heard blood more aggressive than crops but idk frr cuz I don't pay attention to thing like this but somebody outta blue just started asking wats my opinion I didn't even no frr but thats wat some people told me
Soul-Unleashed
2010-06-14 17:55:40 UTC
Bloods. I think they are more widely spread, but i could be wrong.
Ramses
2015-04-25 18:24:40 UTC
the bloods are far more ruthless if you kill one of theirs they will kill 10 of yours
anonymous
2010-06-14 18:17:23 UTC
MS-13 since they're practically a terrorist group.
thumb me down, you know you wanna
2010-06-14 17:55:31 UTC
you'll have to list a location.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...